Newsletter (November 28, 2021)
Announcements
|
|
Conferences & Calls
|
|
Job Announcements
|
Announcements
|
|
Conferences & Calls
|
|
Job Announcements
|
The MayDay Group invites scholars, music makers, educators, and innovators from around the globe to submit proposals to this year’s colloquium centered on the following action ideal:
TECHNOLOGY AND DIGITAL MEDIA
We critically examine ways in which humans and technologies interact, and how these interactions contribute to the development and/or destruction of forms of musical knowledge and practice.
Technologies evolve within socio-cultural contexts as responses to shifting needs and modes of encounters among humans and their surrounding environments. The use of technologies alters the very ways in which we interact, communicate, and make meaning of our world—transforming individual and collective perceptions of knowledge, truth, and justice. Yet, surrounding the creation, introduction, manipulation, and use of each technological tool is an ideological bias with the potential to induce benefits and harms. Implementation of existing and emergent technologies must be balanced with ongoing critique of the commodification of musics, teaching, and learning; inequitable distribution of and access to technological resources; and concerns about corporate power and overreach.
It is hard to imagine modern life and all aspects of music making, learning, and teaching without technology and digital media. As a field, music education has a long history of drawing extensively on literature from other disciplines—most notably philosophy, sociology, psychology, and education—but critical scholarly work from the fields of social/digital media and communications, and the implications that body of work has for music education, has, by and large, been overlooked by music education scholars.
Because the use of technologies and social media use are intersectional in both scope and nature, proposals are invited to address and/or problematize their relationship to/with music learning, teaching, making, production, and consumption. Topics may include (but are not limited to): critical theories of social media, activism, policy, identity formation, curriculum development, gender, feminist theories, class, formal institutions, community music, participatory culture, social music learning theories, and “world musics.” Priority will be given to proposals that connect critical scholarship from the fields of social media and communications with the Action Ideal on Technology and Digital Media.
Inspired by the recent publication of the Oxford Handbook on Social Media and Music Learning (edited by Janice Waldron, Stephanie Horsley, and Kari Veblen), presenters may want to consider the following questions as they craft their proposals:
Presenters are encouraged to address issues and events by taking an interdisciplinary, theoretical, or philosophical approach in their analyses of trends and perceived problems, speaking as much to the wider university community and the public as to our own specialty, and to recommend Action Plans that can broaden our thinking and support a more inclusive, socially aware and informed practice of teaching and learning music in an increasingly pluralistic and diverse world community and classroom.
COLLOQUIUM FORMAT
Presentations—better understood at MayDay Colloquia as provocations—are designed to stimulate discussion and debate. Therefore, each presenter will be allocated 45 minutes, to include no more than 25 minutes for the presentation and no fewer than 20 minutes for discussion. Proposals that go outside the conventional scope of a provocation are encouraged. Musical engagements will also be considered. Projectors, speakers, and screens will be available, but it is completely acceptable to use no supporting technology. Presenters must register and are expected to be in attendance at the colloquium. Extenuating circumstances to in-person presentations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Please contact the colloquium coordinator if accommodations are needed due to political or health related issues.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PROCESS
• Please submit both: a proposal of no more than 800 words (references included in word count)
and an abstract of no more than 100 words as word.doc email attachments. Incomplete
submissions will not be considered.
• State your name, institutional affiliation, email address, and other contact information in the
body of the email only. There should be no identifiers on proposals or abstracts.
• Submit no later than January 17, 2022 to maydaygroup33@gmail.com
• Proposals will be blind reviewed and evaluated according to the following criteria: clarity of ideas, contribution to/interest for the profession, relevance and contribution to theory, and connection to the action ideal and surrounding questions.
• Notification will occur by email no later than February 28, 2022.
• If accepted, the primary presenter and any co-presenters must register for the conference no
later than March 14, 2022 or forfeit their acceptance.
• Registration information will be posted on the MDG 33 Colloquium website.
• Accepted abstracts will be posted to the Colloquium website by April 1, 2022 and cannot be
changed after that date.
The MayDay Group is pleased to share a newsletter with you that is full of calls for proposals: Special Issues of MUSICultures, Journal of Popular Music Education, and Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts; conferences including the International Association for the Society of Popular Music (Canada and US chapters), Georgia Music Educators Conference (GMEA), New York State School Music Association (NYSSMA) and Ontario Music Educators’ Association (OMEA); and book chapters for Modern Musicology and the College Classroom – Crossover, Exchange, Appropriation: Navigating Stylistic Boundaries in the Music History Classroom.
Conferences & Calls
|
Job Announcements
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/3nuC1LP
Announcements
|
Conferences & Calls
|
Job Announcements
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/3ycEMmI
Announcements
|
Conferences & Calls
|
Job Announcements
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/2V2HWvx
Announcements
|
Conferences & Calls
|
Position Vacancies
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/3ds460n
Dear MDG friends,
The MayDay Group has drafted revised Action Ideals, which we are sending to our membership in order to facilitate an informed discussion and voting process during the upcoming MDG Colloquium 32 June 29th-July 1st.
The Action Ideals are an articulation of MayDay Group’s aims, beliefs, and overall vision for music education. We provoke inquiry and change through these ideals, which ground our annual colloquia, publications, dialogue, and practice. Our work in and related to music teaching and learning is guided by the Action Ideals as articulated herein.
Important to the context of this document are the terms music and musicians. While we recognize that many species produce sounds that hold meaning for them, we delimit our definition of music to sounds that humans embody, create, interact meaningfully with, and learn from, situated in social, cultural, spiritual, geographical, historical, and political contexts. Consequently, we define musicians as humans who interact with or produce music through learning, teaching, and creative activities. Musicians engage with diverse musical actions that mirror and create value systems and ways of knowing.
Through the Action Ideals, we examine historical and contemporary ontologies (ways of being), axiologies (values), and epistemologies (ways of knowing) to consider how musicians may contribute to producing and maintaining inequities, and/or challenge taken-for-granted practices in order to open up possibilities for change in music education. We also actively work against—in our field at both local and global levels—entrenched, hegemonic colonial ideologies and practices that alienate many individuals and collectives.
MayDay Group’s Action Ideals are not intended to be hierarchical, rather are iterative and dialogic, and can be read in any order. To that end, we list them alphabetically to denote equal prioritization and increase ease of accessibility. Each keyword/phrase will hyperlink to the specific Action Ideal: anti-oppression and justice; collaboration across cultures; collaboration across disciplines; curriculum; ecological consciousness; policy; technology; theory and philosophy.
Proposed Action Ideals
Draft Revision
Anti-Oppression and Justice
We engage in anti-oppressive actions that challenge and oppose injustices and hate crimes, including white supremacy and cultural elitism, and contribute to equitable experiences in teaching, learning, and musicking.
We create, sustain, and contribute to ways of knowing, doing, and using music in order to address, transform, and/or embrace the conditions of our world. Musical activity and educational conventions—dynamic, living processes rife with power asymmetries and individual and collective biases—develop within diverse contexts and communities of practice. All participants in the teaching and learning process bring a knowledge base that has the potential to extend benefit to one another.
Collaboration Across Cultures
We engage in mutually beneficial collaboration(s) and thoughtful inter-, intra-, cross-, and trans-cultural exchange(s) with musicians outside our own cultural practice(s) to further understanding of one another’s worldviews and related ways of being and doing.
Music and its modes of transmission take place in contexts created by the relationships that connect us to one another and to the myriad modes through which we construct knowledge. Acknowledging that power differentials are embedded in each inter-, intra-, cross-, and trans-cultural exchange, we commit to ethical ways of engagement, which support multiple modes of thinking and doing that lead to meaningful musical actions. Because we participate and collaborate in living cultural praxes, discussions of music’s meanings and educative values must concern not just sound itself and how we listen to it, but also how we engage with, respond to, and perpetuate music’s (de)humanizing functions.
Collaboration Across Disciplines
We collaborate across disciplines to seek new forms of knowledge and spheres of activity and interest.
Issues in music education are inextricably linked to knowledge and inquiry in other disciplines. Therefore, we embrace opportunities for insight and innovation presented by encounters with multiple disciplines that question normative discursive paradigms. Because music takes place in networks of social practices in action, and these practices are connected with and reflective of peoples’ beliefs and theories, our collaborations must continuously examine regimes of truth and taken-for-granted practices.
Curriculum
We conceptualize music curricula as reflexive, dynamic, and lived cultural practices that reflect, enhance, and are relevant and responsive to the lives of individual and collective members of our diverse communities.
We enact living, flexible curricula that reflect the needs and strengths of our classrooms and communities regardless of whether institutional policies enforce prescriptive and top-down mandates or promote grass-roots activism. As music-making is a trans-disciplinary and diverse global practice, we employ an acute criticality towards cultural bias and hegemonic educational practices embedded in the development and implementation of curricula. We problematize the restrictive concept of “curriculum as document,” and the language of outcomes, standards, and assessment involved in the a priori construction of curricular policies.
Ecological Consciousness
We commit to a Land-conscious, environmentally sustainable, and regenerative music education.
Music education is inescapably bound to relationships with Land and exists within ecologies. We challenge taken-for-granted practices that do not consider the historical and ongoing impacts of colonization on such relationships. An environmentally sustainable music education examines how decisions might negatively impact relationships to ecologies (e.g., the mass production of instruments or excessive travel to and from conferences and performances). A regenerative music education is attuned to cultural and physical commons, the inherent value of non-human beings, and people musicking for environmental activism. Thus, music education plays an essential role in acknowledging and alleviating environmental crises—holding greater potential for critical reflection on the ecological impact of former, current, and future musical and cultural practices.
Policy
We investigate systemic decisions, contributions, and policies of institutions to determine the extent and directions of their influence on music learning and teaching.
Teaching and learning are inherently political endeavors, as are decisions and mandates by various arts, educational, and governmental organizations. The current climate of privatization, competition, and profit undermines a vision of education that fosters an ethic of care and social wellbeing. Through corporate lobbying, policymakers have inserted neoliberal frameworks into educational spaces that often induce harm and alienate participants. Such frameworks hold individual stakeholders accountable while providing corporations latitude to shirk responsibility. In order to improve existing structures and influence institutional change, we actualize a frame of mind oriented toward policy, with inquiry that leads to action, adaptation, and implementation made manifest through practice.
Technology and Digital Media
We critically examine ways in which humans and technologies interact, and how these interactions contribute to the development and/or destruction of forms of musical knowledge and practice.
Technologies evolve within socio-cultural contexts as responses to shifting needs and modes of encounters among humans and their surrounding environments. The use of technologies alters the very ways in which we interact, communicate, and make meaning of our world—transforming individual and collective perceptions of knowledge, truth, and justice. Yet, surrounding the creation, introduction, manipulation, and use of each technological tool is an ideological bias with the potential to induce benefits and harms. Implementation of existing and emergent technologies must be balanced with ongoing critique of the commodification of musics, teaching, and learning; inequitable distribution of and access to technological resources; and concerns about corporate power and overreach.
Theory and Philosophy
We actively engage with and generate theory and philosophy to understand the relationship(s) between musical actions and their contextual meanings and values.
We account for the fullest range of meanings and modes of thinking inherent in individual and collective musical actions. This requires asking new questions and developing robust toolkits for understanding and theorizing how we position and are positioned as part of larger groups and practices operating within multiple layers of social, cultural, spiritual, geographical, historical, and political contexts. In so doing, we work to avoid the trappings of narrative frameworks that may oppress or misrepresent the contexts in which we seek greater theoretical and philosophical understandings. We embrace pluralism in knowledge construction (e.g., Indigenous, queer, feminist) which promotes interpretations of musical actions from multiple worldviews and creates more equitable representation.
MDG members may provide anonymous feedback by clicking the link below before June 30th, 11:59pm EST; or in person at the Business Meeting on the final day of the upcoming MDG Colloquium.
Share feedback via https://bit.ly/MDGActionIdealsRevision
|
Announcements
|
|
Conferences & Calls
|
|
Job Announcements
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/3wKjwEV
Announcements
|
Conferences & Calls
|
Job Announcements
|
Read the full newsletter here: https://conta.cc/3g1HAfp